Mars, outer space, and now clay–evolutionists keep grasping for wrong answers

The past few days, there have been a few news items about possible locations for the origins of life on Earth. Here are two different news items:

November 06, 2013

According to a news release from Cornell University, clay may have been the birthplace of life on our planet.

“We propose that in early geological history clay hydrogel provided a confinement function for biomolecules and biochemical reactions,” noted Dan Luo, professor of biological and environmental engineering at Cornell University.

In simulated primitive seawater, clay develops a hydrogel — a collection of microscopic spaces able to soak up liquids just like a sponge. Over many years, chemicals contained in those space could resulted in complex reactions that developed proteins, DNA and all the components that help a living cell function. Clay hydrogels could have enclosed and shielded those chemical processes until the membrane that encircles living cells formed. http://natmonitor.com/2013/11/06/researchers-clay-may-have-been-the-birthplace-of-life-on-earth/

Galaxy is CRAMMED with EARTH-LIKE WORLDS – also, probably, ALIENS

Nearest ones are probably getting our TV from 2001

Fresh data from the Kepler space telescope shows at least a fifth of stars surveyed have Earth-like planets in a “Goldilocks” orbit – a habitable sweet spot that’s not too hot or too cold for liquid water – and that’s just the stars we can see…

However, that’s just planets that can support life – there’s no guarantee that they actually do or that they could support human existence. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/04/kepler_earth_like_planets_habitable/

So, the evolutionists have come up with a new hope for where life on Earth started–clay. And, in case people do not wish to believe that, others are trying to claim that there are many planets that can support life, thus implying that they either do or somehow life from them got to the Earth.

They have to keep coming up with guesses as science has still not proven their unprovable model for life beginning without God.

As a scientist, I have long known that proponents of evolution treat the subject more like a religious view than a scientific theory. This is somewhat also what the Ben Stein movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed revealed (see Ben Stein’s Expelled).

Which was?

Scientists who challenge too many claims associated with evolution are shunned by many academic institutions, as there is a tremendous amount of pressure at most “leading” academic institutions to squelch research that is not in support of evolution because it will affect their beliefs. Thus many ‘accept’ evolution and act like it is a scientific fact, when instead it is an unproven model that can scientifically be rebutted at various stages.

There is no real scientific doubt that evolution as the origin of life is false. It violates too many known laws of biology. It has gotten so bad, as I reported about earlier, that some so-called ‘scientists’ are now claiming that life on Earth probably came from Mars as the Earth did not have certain building blocks like Mars does (see BBC: Life may have come from Mars?). This is additional proof that some scientists who profess evolution as life’s origin realize that it does not hold up to true scientific scrutiny.

A little while back, famous atheist Richard Dawkins, instead of having a real answer to life’s origin, basically referred to it as a mystery (see Richard Dawkins refers to ‘mysterious origin’ of the universe).

As it turns out, the one explanation that is plausible and fits with know laws of biology, etc. is that a Creator started life. But many evolutionists do not wish to accept the scientific inevitability that this is the only explanation that does not violate true science.

Evolution has led to the intentional ignorance of appropriate scientific methods. It became a religion for many in the 19th century, and remains one for many today. Shunning or insulting scientists who come out with the truth is one way that they hope to control public debate on the matter.

But the truth is still the truth, as “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1), etc.

As far as clay, the Bible does say that “the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being” (Genesis 2:7), but that is very different than Cornell University’s new (and false) explanation.

Life did not spring up without Divine intervention. The evolutionists continue to grasp at wrong answers.

Some items of possibly related interest may include:

Is God’s Existence Logical? Some say it is not logical to believe in God. Is that true?
Is Evolution Probable or Impossible or Is God’s Existence Logical? Part II This short article clearly answers what ‘pseudo-scientists’ refuse to acknowledge. Here is a link to a YouTube video titled Quickly Disprove Evolution as the Origin of Life.
How Old is the Earth and How Long Were the Days of Creation? Does the Bible allow for the creation of the universe and earth billions of years ago? Why do some believe they are no older than 6,000 years old? What is the gap theory? Where the days of creation in Genesis 1:3 through 2:3 24 hours long?
Where Did God Come From? Any ideas? And how has God been able to exist? Who is God?
How is God Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient? Here is a biblical article which answers what many really wonder about it.
Has time been lost? It Saturday the seventh day of the week?
Why Were You Born? Why did God make you? Herbert W. Armstrong wrote this as a booklet on this important subject. You may also wish to read the article What is Your Destiny? or watch the video, also titled What is Your Destiny?
What is the Meaning of Life? Who does God say is happy? What is your ultimate destiny? Do you really know? Does God actually have a plan for YOU personally? There is also a video titled What is the meaning of your life?