Church of God News

Rand Paul, Official Senate Photo

COGwriter

US Senator Rand Paul and former US Defense Secretary Robert Gates have written about USA warmongering:

Sen. Rand Paul may not be a foreign policy hawk but he is a political one. He wrote, in a recent critique of his Republican colleagues: “What we don’t need right now is politicians who have never seen war talking tough for the sake of their political careers.” Incoming! Paul was talking about grandstanding responses to the Ukraine crisis. It wasn’t a pinprick attack about a policy disagreement: Sen. Paul is claiming his rivals–ignorant to the sacrifices of war–are too cavalier about committing American troops to foreign conflicts in their rush to make a name for themselves…Paul’s charge against his competition was a solid tremor in the vibrating football game of the 2016 presidential campaign, but it also raised interesting questions about the experience required to be president.

Paul is not the only one to link the issue of sacrifice and hot rhetoric. That was a central message of former Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ book: Both parties are too quick to threaten war. It’s a fascinating question that should engage us between now and the next presidential election.

Paul’s argument would seem to offer aid and comfort to Hillary Clinton. She, above all likely 2016 candidates, has had actual experience with the topics of war and peace. That’s part of what gives the Benghazi attacks their potency. She was in a position of responsibility when one of her ambassadors died in a terrorist attack. But if Paul is claiming that seeing war gives you some special insight, she has seen its costs from a closer perspective than anyone in the Republican field. It would be cleaner for Republicans if the Obama team, including Clinton, could just be labeled weak. Rand Paul is calling for a more reasoned and fact-based discussion of foreign policy; he is asking people to assess whether the people taking hawkish positions have the standing to take those positions. This is the way we should all want to talk about foreign policy in a presidential campaign, but it bares little resemblance to the way that it is is discussed. In a campaign, the conversation is reductionist and appeals to emotion. The current tussle with Russia offers a good example.  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rand-pauls-preemptive-strike/

Paul’s charge arrives at a moment of flux in American foreign policy. The question of whether a president’s posture invites aggression from other countries is open for general discussion again in a way it was not during the Bush years and in their aftermath. Barack Obama won the 2008 presidential campaign in part because voters thought the previous administration was too concerned with appearing tough. But now, only 39 percent of the country approve of the way the president is handling foreign policy, according to the recent CBS/New York Times poll. The Washington Post says Obama’s foreign policy “is based on fantasy.”

Republicans see a chance to regain their foreign policy edge with voters, and hawks see a chance to regain ground in the debate over how to approach the world. Paul is providing an inadvertent defense of President Obama’s foreign policy in this debate.

The Republican critique of President Obama operates on a simple switch. He is weak, which invites peril. Condoleezza Rice, for example, argued recently that Obama’s weakness invited Russian aggression. Paul is also a target of this critique. At CPAC, former U.N. ambassador John Bolton said that while isolationists came to their ideology by a different route than the feckless Barack Obama, the views were effectively the same.

There are specific ways in which the president may appear weak—his fishtailing Syria policy is a good example—but the critique doesn’t rely on specifics. It simply relies on Obama being in office while bad things are happening in the world. If he were strong, goes the critique, these things wouldn’t be happening.  http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/rand_paul_foreign_policy_and_military_service_the_kentucky_senator_just.html

Of course, throughout world history, political leaders have tried to use war and sending the children of others out to war for political advantage.  Many do not realize that this is also sometimes true in the USA.

The USA itself has been involved in so many armed conflicts that most have lost count.

The USA has effectively appointed itself as the world’s policeman.  Though many publicly complain about that, much of the time many in the world, in general, seem to support the USA’s military actions.  That does not make them right, but it has encouraged the USA to continue to be engaged in wars and threats of wars.

It should be noted that the Bible has warnings of destruction for the violent:

23 ‘Make a chain,
For the land is filled with crimes of blood,
And the city is full of violence.
24 Therefore I will bring the worst of the Gentiles,
And they will possess their houses;
I will cause the pomp of the strong to cease,
And their holy places shall be defiled.   (Ezekiel 7:23-24)

7 The violence of the wicked will destroy them,
Because they refuse to do justice.  (Proverbs 21:7)

6 Therefore pride serves as their necklace; Violence covers them like a garment. 7 Their eyes bulge with abundance; They have more than heart could wish. 8 They scoff and speak wickedly concerning oppression; They speak loftily. 9 They set their mouth against the heavens, And their tongue walks through the earth. 10 Therefore his people return here, And waters of a full cup are drained by them. 11 And they say, “How does God know?And is there knowledge in the Most High?” 12 Behold, these are the ungodly, Who are always at ease; They increase in riches. 13 Surely I have cleansed my heart in vain,And washed my hands in innocence. 14 For all day long I have been plagued,And chastened every morning.  15 If I had said, “I will speak thus,”Behold, I would have been untrue to the generation of Your children. 16 When I thought how to understand this, It was too painful for me —  17 Until I went into the sanctuary of God; Then I understood their end. 18 Surely You set them in slippery places; You cast them down to destruction. 19 Oh, how they are brought to desolation, as in a moment! They are utterly consumed with terrors.  (Psalm 73:6-19)

6 “Will not all these take up a proverb against him,
And a taunting riddle against him, and say,
‘Woe to him who increases
What is not his — how long?
And to him who loads himself with many pledges’?
7 Will not your creditors rise up suddenly?
Will they not awaken who oppress you?
And you will become their booty.
8 Because you have plundered many nations,
All the remnant of the people shall plunder you,
Because of men’s blood
And the violence of the land and the city,
And of all who dwell in it.  (Habakkuk 2:6-8)

52…all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword (Matthew 26:52, KJV)

Terrors and destruction are what is prophesied for the warmongers (including the highly indebted ones). And notice that Psalm 73 indicates that this will happen to those that are at ease, and apparently do not think that it could happen to them.

Already some terrorism has affected the USA, but much more is expected in the future.  The Bible tells of destruction to come to the violent and highly indebted–and no nation has been more in debt than the USA.  The Bible also tells of destruction coming to the most powerful military on the planet in the end times (Daniel 11:39)–this does not bode well for the USA.

Iowa 2016 Presidential Preference Poll

On other USA matters, a poll released today indicates that Hillary Clinton is currently the favorite for the 2016 presidential elections:

March 13, 2014

DES MOINES | Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has turned around her potential political fortunes in Iowa, according to a presidential preference poll released this morning.

The former first lady who is being encouraged to make another White House run in 2016 leads Gov. Chris Christie 48 to 35 in a hypothetical matchup, according to a Quinnipiac University Poll of 1,411 registered voters in Iowa. That reverses the New Jersey governor’s 48 to 45 percent lead in a December Quinnipiac poll…

She has a 49 to 39 percent lead over Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, 51 to 35 percent over U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and 51 to 37 percent over former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida…

By a 55 to 38 percent margin, Iowans say Clinton would make a good president, the only listed candidate to get a positive score.  http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/clinton-takes-iowa-lead-in-presidential-matchup/article_a4b3c311-3e73-526a-aae6-26cd35e5341b.html

This is not a surprise, but it is still too early to know who will win.  Although she has taken steps consistent with one who would run for president in 2016, Hillary Clinton has not declared that she would.  If she does run and win, I believe that she will help fulfill several prophecies (see Hillary Clinton in Prophecy).

Tweet

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 13th, 2014 at 7:01 am and is filed under Prophecy.

• Rand Paul and Hillary Clinton top a poll in be presidential nominees
• Barack Obama jokes about Fox News, Hillary Clinton, Rand Paul, etc.
• Rand Paul beats Hillary Clinton in Colorado Presidential Poll
• Hillary Clinton Confirms Special Relationship Between the USA and the UK
• Hillary Clinton back to public appearances, plus a book deal
• CPAC, Rand Paul, and the Future of the USA
• Free ‘Hillary Clinton Prophecy, What About Donald Trump?’ book
• Ted Cruz emerges as a top potential candidate
• Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
• NBC/WSJ Poll: Hillary Clinton currently leads all Democratic and Republican presidential hopefuls