Archive for April, 2009

Archeology: First Post-Exodus Evidence?

Monday, April 6th, 2009


Jordan Valley site the first built after the Exodus?

COGwriter

The following was of interest today:

Have the first Israelite sites built after Exodus been found?

Haaretz – April 6, 2009
A Haifa University archaeologist on Monday said he has unearthed structures in the shape of human feet believed to have been erected by the Israelites upon their initial entry to the Land of Canaan.Prof. Adam Zertal said that the large compounds discovered in the Jordan Valley were “the first sites to have been built by the Israelites upon entering Canaan and manifest the biblical notion of claiming ownership of the land by setting feet on it.”

Prof. Zertal’s excavation team uncovered five large foot-shaped compounds that he identifies as the biblical site of Gilgal.Most contemporary archaeologists do not consider the Israelite Exodus from Egypt and the conquest of Israel to be verifiable historical events. Zertal is one of the few Israeli archaeologists who claim to have found archaeological evidence supporting the Israelite entrance to Canaan.

Zertal’s most famous discovery is a compound on Mount Ebal near Nablus, which he identified as the site of the Covenant ceremony depicted in the biblical Book of Joshua. Other archaeologists have identified that site as a watchtower.

Zertal has also recently claimed to have found clay markings unique to early Israelites, around the time of the conquest of Canaan described in the Bible.

According to the Book of Joshua, the Israelites arrived at Gilgal after having crossed the Jordan River. Some researchers have claimed that Gilgal is named after the collection of stones at the site that were used during various rituals, but no archaeological evidence has been discovered to support that claim.

Since 1990, five sites shaped like human feet have been excavated in the Jordan Valley. All five date back to the early Iron Age (12th to 13th centuries B.C.E.), and their shapes indicate that they were used as communal gathering places.

Zertal said that the foot-shaped sites were used during ceremonies following the Israelites’ entry into the Land of Canaan. He added that the concept of the Jewish pilgrimage to Jerusalem on three major holidays (known as “aliya la’regel” or ascending on foot) also originates from the foot-shaped sites in the Jordan Valley and Mount Ebal. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1076836.html

This is exciting, presuming that it is true.  The fact is that the Bible is reliable whether or not “most contemporary archaeologists” accept it to be or not.  Throughout the past couple of centuries, archeologists that disputed biblical accounts on many matters have often proven to have been in error.

The exodus did happen, and over time, more archeological evidence is likely to be uncovered.

Some articles of possibly related interest may include:

Is God’s Existence Logical? Some say it is not logical to believe in God. Is that true?
Is Evolution Probable or Impossible or Is God’s Existence Logical? Part II This short article clearly answers what ‘pseudo-scientists’ refuse to acknowledge.
Where Did God Come From? Any ideas? And how has God been able to exist? Who is God?
How is God Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient? Here is a biblical article by Wallace Smith which answers what many really wonder about it.
What is the Meaning of Life? Who does God say is happy? What is your ultimate destiny? Do you really know? Does God actually have a plan for YOU personally?
The Bible: Fact or Fiction? This is a booklet written by Douglas Winnail that answers if the Bible is just a collection of myths and legends or the inspired word of God.

“Holy Week”

Monday, April 6th, 2009


Early Christians Observed Passover

COGwriter

Some claim that today begins what many call “Holy Week” (others claim it started on Saturday or Sunday):

Holy Week begins Monday

By Ronica Shannon
Register News Writer…

Holy Week among the Christian religion recognizes the last week of Jesus’ life.

Irrespective of the start date, the fact is that this year the Hebrew calendar dates of the events of the final week of Jesus’ life fall on the same days of the week that they occurred nearly two thousand years ago.

The other fact is that most who profess Christ do not realize that when Jesus took the Passover with His disciples, it was on a Tuesday after sunset, that He was arrested later that night, and crucified on a Wednesday, placed in a tomb late Wednesday (prior to sunset), that Wednesday night at sunset was a “high day” (John 19:31), Jesus was resurrected on a Saturday, and that He was out of the grave well before sunrise on a Sunday (John 20:1).

Various Catholic and Protestant scholars recognize this, but most people outside of the COGs do not:

Time is relative in determining chronology of Holy Week…There’s a possibility that Good Friday should actually be Good Thursday – or maybe even Good Wednesday. And there’s a probability that Easter Sunday should be considered Easter Saturday Evening.

Whether the events of Holy Week, the days leading up to Jesus’s death and resurrection, occurred as they are now celebrated continues to be an occasional topic of discussion and study, scholars like Kevin Zuber of Moody Bible Institute say. (Miller M. Bend Time is relative in determining chronology of Holy Week. Weekly News for Oregon. March 16, 2007)

Jerry Falwell, a Sunday-keeper and chancellor of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Va., agreed with that timetable, telling WND in 2001, “I personally believe He was crucified on Wednesday evening … and rose after 6 p.m. Saturday evening.” (Kovac, Joe. ‘Deception’: Christians war over worship day. Posted: March 16, 2008 5:24 pm Eastern. WorldNetDaily)

For when we had eaten the passover on the third day of the week at even, we went forth to the Mount of Olives; and in the night they seized our Lord Jesus. And the next day, which was the fourth of the week, He remained in ward in the house of Caiaphas the high priest. And on the same day the chiefs of the people were assembled and took counsel against Him.  (Didascalia Apostolorum, Chapter 21, verse 14. R. Hugh Connolly, version Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929).

Now is manifested the reason of the truth why the fourth day is called the Tetras, why we fast even to the ninth hour, or even to the evening, or why there should be a passing over even to the next day…The man Christ Jesus, the originator of these things whereof we have above spoken, was taken prisoner by wicked hands, by a quaternion of soldiers. Therefore on account of His captivity by a quaternion, on account of the majesty of His works,–that the seasons also, wholesome to humanity, joyful for the harvests, tranquil for the tempests, may roll on,–therefore we make the fourth day a station or a supernumerary fast (Victorinus. On the Creation of the World. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 7. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1886. Online Edition Copyright © 2004 by K. Knight).

The last account above account shows that a fasting occurred the fourth day (tetras means fourth) at the ninth hour (3:00 pm). That is the precise time of the death of Christ according to the Bible. Victorinus (a Catholic bishop in the third century) is admitting that later that day, there was the Passover time (as does the Bible). He also clearly states that Jesus was arrested on Wednesday. And that is correct (what is not correct is that the Bible does not allow that Jesus did not die until Friday, with a Wednesday arrest, which is what these sources seem to believe).

It may be of interest to note that, even in the 21st Century, the Roman Catholics still teach that this Passover (which they call the Last Supper) was kept by Jesus on a Tuesday night and that He was betrayed on a Wednesday (Zanchettin L, ed. Meditations, Tuesday, April 11, Wednesday April 12. the WORD among us–The #1 Monthly Devotional for Catholics. 2006; Volume 25, Number 4, pp. 63-64).

Those who want to learn more about the sequence and many of the practices that early Christians observed related to these days should consider studying the following articles:

What Happened in the Crucifixion Week? How long are three days and three nights? Did Jesus die on “Good Friday”? Was the resurrection on Sunday? Do you really know? Who determined the date of Easter?
Did Early Christians Celebrate Easter? If not, when did this happen? What do scholars and the Bible reveal?
Is There “An Annual Worship Calendar” In the Bible? This paper provides a biblical and historical critique of several articles, including one by WCG which states that this should be a local decision. What do the Holy Days mean? Also you can click here for the calendar of Holy Days.
Passover and the Early Church Did the early Christians observe Passover? What did Jesus and Paul teach? Why did Jesus die for our sins?
Melito’s Homily on the Passover This is one of the earliest Christian writings about the Passover. This also includes what Apollinaris wrote on the Passover as well.
TPM: Passover on the 14th or 15th? While the LCG observes Passover on the 14th, some observe it on the 15th. Why is the 14th correct?
The Night to Be Observed What is the night to be much observed? When is it? Why do Jews keep Passover twice and emphasize the wrong date?
Should Christians Keep the Days of Unleavened Bread? Do they have any use or meaning now? What is leaven? This article supplies some biblical answers.
UCG and Its Unleavened Bread Study Paper What does the Bible say about eating unleavened bread for seven days? What has UCG officially said about it?

Italian Earthquake

Monday, April 6th, 2009


Aerial View of L’Aquila

COGwriter

There was a deadly earthquake in Italy:

Deadly Earthquake Strikes Central Italy

By MARTA FALCONI,AP
posted: 2 HOURS 37 MINUTES AGO
L’AQUILA, Italy (April 6) – A powerful earthquake in mountainous central Italy knocked down whole blocks of buildings early Monday as residents slept, killing at least 50 people and trapping many more, officials said. Thousands were homeless.
The earthquake’s epicenter was about 70 miles northeast of Rome near the medieval city of L’Aquila. It struck at 3:32 a.m. local time (0132 GMT) in a quake-prone region that has had at least nine smaller jolts since the beginning of April. The U.S. Geological Survey said Monday’s quake was magnitude 6.3, but Italy’s National Institute of Geophysics put it at 5.8…
L’Aquila Mayor Massimo Cialente said some 100,000 people had left their homes and that many buildings in the city’s historic center were damaged. Slabs of walls, twisted steel supports, furniture and wire fences were strewn about the streets and a gray dust carpeted sidewalks, cars and residents. http://news.aol.com/article/italy-earthquake/414975?icid=main|htmlws-main|dl2|link3|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fitaly-earthquake%2F414975

A report just out increased the death toll to at least 70.

Here is a little background on the city from Wikipedia:

The city’s construction was begun by Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Sicily out of several already existing villages, as a bulwark against the power of the papacy. The name of Aquila means “Eagle” in Italian. Construction was completed in 1254 under Frederick’s son, Conrad IV of Germany. The name was switched to Aquila degli Abruzzi in 1861, and L’Aquila in 1939.

Whether any will claim that the earthquake is retribution for the city’s ancient founding against the papacy is not clear at this time.

But what is clear is that Jesus did prophesy earthquakes:

7…And there will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows (Matthew 24:7-8).

We are in or at least near, the start of what Jesus called “the beginning of sorrows”.  But the end (meaning the Great Tribulation) is not yet (cf. Matthew 24:21).

Several articles of possibly related interest may include:

Can the Great Tribulation Begin in 2009, 2010, or 2011? Can the Great Tribulation begin today? When is the earliest that the Great Tribulation can begin? What is the Day of the Lord?
End of Mayan Calendar 2012–Might 2012 Mean Something? There is a Mayan calendar prediction for change in 2012. 2012 changes were also centuries ago predicted by the Hopi Native Americans (the Hindus may have some predictions for the next decade as well). Do these Mayan/Hindu/Hopi prophecies have any value? Why might Satan have inspired this date? Does the Dresden codex show destruction of the earth by flood? Can the great tribulation start before 2012?
Does God Have a 6,000 Year Plan? What Year Does the 6,000 Years End? Was a 6000 year time allowed for humans to rule followed by a literal thousand year reign of Christ on Earth taught by the early Christians? When does the six thousand years of human rule end?

TPM Advocates Wrong Passover Date

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

COGwriter

One of the first clear doctrinal changes that the Church of Rome instituted was changing the date of Passover from the 14th of Nisan to what is normally the first Sunday past it.

Those associated with Rome later called those who kept the original date “Quartodecimans”, from the Latin word meaning 14th.  This is a clear and documented fact of history.

Yet, some with a WCG background have changed the date to be the 15th of Nisan instead.  One such person is TPM’s William Dankenbring.  In perhaps his latest article on the subject he makes such assertions as:

The 14th of Nisan was the final day when preparations were made for the actual Passover Feast which was celebrated on the 15th of Nisan. John clearly says so! So do Matthew and Mark. Luke also corroborates this fact (Luke 22:1, 7). Neither Jesus nor His disciples would have waited till the very last moment to begin preparation for Passover. Therefore, the Lord’s Supper could not have been the same as the “Passover.” (Dankenbring W. PASSOVER – 14th or 15th of Nisan? http://www.triumphpro.com/passover-14th-or-15th-new.pdf)

Yet, this is in error.  The meal that Jesus ate, He called the Passover:

With fervent desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer…(Luke 22:15).

When did the early church observe Passover?

Astoundingly, TPM states that the early church kept the 15th based on inaccurate information. Look at the following:

Proof No. 16 — Proof of the Early Church

When did the early Christian Church, in the days of the first and second centuries, observe the Passover?  What does the record of Church history say?  Samuel Bacchiocchi, in his scholarly book From Sabbath to Sunday.- A Historical Investigation of the Rise of Sunday Observance in Early Christianity, wrote:

“Moreover we know from the Quartodeciman’s sources (i.e. those who kept Passover on Nisan 14 ACCORDING TO THE JEWISH RECKONING), which apparently represent a DIRECT CONTINUATION OF THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH, that the PASCHAL FEAST WAS INDEED OBSERVED BY CHRISTIANS.  Its celebration … occurred … as well stated by J. Jeremias, ‘at the SAME TIME AS THE JEWISH PASSOVER, that is, on the NIGHT OF THE 15TH OF NISAN. . .” (page 81).

Bacchiocchi writes, in plain language, later on in his monumental classic work:

“. . . Epiphanius (ca.  A.D. 315-403) suggests that UNTIL A.D. 135 Christians  EVERYWHERE observed Passover ON THE JEWISH DATE, namely, ON NISAN 15, irrespective of the day of the week” (ibid.).

This is plain, incontrovertible PROOF that both the Jews, and early Christians, observed the Passover — and they both did so ON NISAN 15 — NOT at the beginning of Nisan 14, as some churches claim should be done, today!  Nor did they substitute “Easter” Sunday in its place, as later paganized Gentiles began to do, especially after the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D…

Now you know the truth.  What are you going to do about it? (Dankenbring WF. Come out of Babylon, My People! SEVENTEEN PROOFS Why PASSOVER Should Be Observed on Nisan 15! http://www.triumphpro.com/passover17.htm 6/21/06).

This is one of the most ridiculous proofs that TPM uses. In the Spring of 2005, I even wrote to W. Dankenbring to inform him that Dr. Bacchiocchi erred on page 81 of that book (and I did inform Dr. Bacchiocchi also), but that Dr. Bacchiocchi’s book has the information correct on page 161, but TPM still has not corrected the above error. Thus when I confronted W.F. Dankenbring with the proof, he refused it. I offered to FAX him the relevant page from Epiphanius if he would provide me his FAX number, but he failed to provide it.

I have given TPM nearly four years to change this, but since the same false information is still at its website (at least as of yesterday), I decided that now everyone should know this.  Those wanting more details, should review the new article TPM: Passover on the 14th or 15th?

How can anyone rely on the writings of one who is relying on a secondary source he has been told is wrong who also refuses to even look at the primary source?

Although all researchers use secondary sources at times, all true researchers realize that PRIMARY sources are far superior. Although I do have Samuel Bacchiocchi’s book From Sabbath to Sunday.- A Historical Investigation of the Rise of Sunday Observance in Early Christianity, I also went to the library and borrowed the writing from Epiphanius that Dr. Bacchiocchi referred to. And I made a photocopy of the relevant page–the relevant page only states that their had been 15 bishops of Jerusalem–it says nothing about the DATE of Passover. Nothing about it being observed on the 15th.

The term fifteen (or the numeral 15) is used on twice on the portion of the Panarion of Epiphanius that Dr. Bacchiocchi’s cites:

And there were altogether fifteen bishops from the circumcision (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide). Section VI, Verse 10,4. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, p. 412).

I.e., the first fifteen bishops of Jerusalem (The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide). Section VI. Footnote presumably from the translator. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, p. 412).

When does the Panarion of Epiphanius actually state that the Passover was kept? Well on the 14th:

The Quartodecimans contentiously keep Passover on the one day, once per year…They keep the Passover on whichever day the fourteenth of the month falls…Christ had to be slain on the fourteenth of the month in accordance with the law (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide). Section IV, Verses 1,3;1,6;2,6. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp. 23-25).

It is of interest to note that Epiphanius recognized that Jesus HAD to be slain on the 14th of the month. It is sad that Epiphanius and others did not believe they needed to observe it when and how Jesus taught.

It is the practices of the early true leaders of the true that we should be referring to.

Astoundingly, TPM inaccurately also cites Apollinaris for proof that it is correct:

APOLLINARIS BISHOP OF HIERAPOLISPolycarp was martyred shortly after his visit to Rome in A.D. 156. The view that Christ was crucified on the fifteenth of Abib was attacked and refuted by Claudius Apollinaris Bishop of Hierapolis A.D. 160-180. He was known by Polycarp and was influenced by Polycarp’s example and his teachings. Apollinaris was also a contemporary of Melito and Polycrates. Here is what Apollinaris says in regards to this view:

‘”There are, then, some who through ignorance raise disputes about these things (though their conduct is pardonable: for ignorance is no subject for blame — it rather needs further instruction), and say that ON THE FOURTEENTH DAY THE LORD ATE THE LAMB WITH THE DISCIPLES, AND THAT ON THE GREAT DAY OF THE FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD HE HIMSELF SUFFERED; and they quote Matthew as speaking in accordance with their view. WHEREFORE THEIR OPINION IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW, AND THE GOSPELS SEEMS TO BE AT VARIANCE WITH THEM.”

Please notice that Apollinaris categorically says that this view is contrary to the law and the Gospels! (When Apollinaris says Christ ate the lamb on the fourteenth, it is actually the fifteenth, but according to Roman reckoning of the moon the day is still the fourteenth until midnight, when the fifteenth begins). (Karakasidis G. THE QUARTODECIMAN PASSOVER Which Day Was It? Triumph Prophetic Ministries, Church of God, http://www.triumphpro.com/the_quartodeciman_passover____which_day_was_it.htm 6/23/06).

Carefully note that Apollinaris is arguing that the Passover was not eaten during the day of the 14th, not that it was not eaten the prior evening of the 14th. Contrary to TPM’s view, Apollinaris is showing when the Passover is (Nisan 14) and that it signifies the sacrifice of Christ, both of which are the positions of the Churches of God. Apollinaris is specifically criticizing those that say Jesus was crucified on “the great day of the feast of unleavened bread”, which according to the Bible (Leviticus 23:6), is the 15th. There is absolutely NO WAY that TPM is correct above when they argue that Apollinaris observed the 14th on the Roman calendar which was the 15th on the Hebrew calendar because it is the 15th on the Hebrew calendar that is being referred to (for TPM to be correct, the first great day of unleavened bread would have to be on the 16th on the Hebrew calendar.

But it is interesting to note that even in Apollinaris’ time some falsely argued that the Passover should be on the 15th. Yet, Apollinaris stood for the observance on the 14th.

Melito, Polycrates, Polycarp, Apollinaris are considered to be Quartodecimans (one who held that the date of Passover must remain the 14th of Nisan).

Rome was the church that was against Quartodeciman practices. And in a letter rebutting Rome, Polycrates states that in his region, the Apostles John and Philip kept the Passover the same time he did as they and he would not deviate from the Bible.

The Catholic historian Eusebius tells of the problem of the date:

A QUESTION of no small importance arose at that time. For the parishes of all Asia, as from an older tradition, held that the fourteenth day of the moon, on which day the Jews were commanded to sacrifice the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Saviour’s passover…But it was not the custom of the churches in the rest of the world…But the bishops of Asia, led by Polycrates, decided to hold to the old custom handed down to them. He himself, in a letter which he addressed to Victor and the church of Rome, set forth in the following words the tradition which had come down to him (Eusebius. Church History. Book V, Chapters 23,25).

Notice that Eusebius states that it was those led by Polycrates who held that they needed to heed an older tradition (than the Roman one), one that observed Christ’s Passover on the fourteenth!

And as far as Passover, notice the first time the date is mentioned in the Bible:

Now you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of the same month. Then the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill it at twilight…It is the LORD’s Passover (Exodus 12:6,11).

The fact is that Passover is on the 14th.  Which, this year, means it falls right after sunset on April 7th.

Some articles of related interest may include:

TPM: Passover on the 14th or 15th? While the LCG observes Passover on the 14th, some observe it on the 15th. Why is the 14th correct?
Is There “An Annual Worship Calendar” In the Bible? This paper provides a biblical and historical critique of several articles, including one by WCG which states that this should be a local decision. What do the Holy Days mean? Also you can click here for the calendar of Holy Days.
Passover and the Early Church Did the early Christians observe Passover? What did Jesus and Paul teach? Why did Jesus die for our sins?
Melito’s Homily on the Passover This is one of the earliest Christian writings about the Passover. This also includes what Apollinaris wrote on the Passover as well.
The Night to Be Observed What is it? When is it? Why do Jews keep Passover twice and emphasize the wrong date?
Should Christians Keep the Days of Unleavened Bread? Do they have any use or meaning now? What is leaven? This article supplies some biblical answers.

COGwriter Link Problems

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

Internet Users By Country

COGwriter

Several readers have mentioned that the links on many of the News page items have not worked in the past few weeks.

This seems to have been due to a combination of a WordPress upgrade and how certain browsers modify the URLs for some of the links from WordPress.

Michael Thiel has looked this over and we believe that this has been corrected.  Additionally, this should also correct most of the time the picture has not been appearing as well (almost all items on this News page have some type of photograph or other illustration).

In any event, the links all have been working on the www.cogwriter.com page.  Thus, readers are advised to go to the COGwriter home page if this problem recurs.

We are very sorry that these things happen, but believe that it has been mostly corrected.

LCG: U.S. Helps Build the Beast

Saturday, April 4th, 2009

European Union Tower of Babel Poster

COGwriter

The above poster was produced by the Europeans over a decade ago.  Many non-European nations worked to help produce this Babylon last week (though they seem to be unaware of it).

LCG reported the following:

U.S. Helps Build the Beast? A recent article in the London Telegraph reported, “Barack Obama heads to Britain and Europe in two weeks’ time as the leader of the first U.S. administration to wholeheartedly back the creation of a federal Europe. In contrast to earlier U.S. administrations… the Obama administration is avowedly Euro-federalist in outlook, and is keen to help build a European Union defense identity as well as support the foundations of a European superstate in Brussels” (emphasis ours). Actions to support the European superstate are in stark contrast with the traditional US support for national sovereignty among European nations (Telegraph, March 18, 2009). From a human viewpoint, supporting the development of a European superstate might appear to be in the best interests of the U.S., because it could add to stability in Europe, both politically and economically— ultimately benefitting the U.S. and the entire world. However, from a biblical perspective, knowing that a world-dominating Beast power must arise in Europe, it is sobering to watch the US support actions that will lead to a power that will ultimately be a tool in God’s hands to punish Israelite-descended nations (see Deuteronomy 28, Amos 5:1-3). Because the U.S. has departed from God’s ways and no longer reads or understands the Bible, it is very likely helping build the end-time Beast Power that will later destroy it.

Now that the conference is over, it is clear that the U.S.A. (and U.K. for that matter) helped build the Beast (see G20 Praises “New World Order”).

This is one of the eight reasons I listed several months ago why I felt that the Obama presidency would be “apocalyptic”.   Notice reason #6 I posted on November 19, 2008:

6. Barck Obama has pledged increased cooperation with the Europeans.  This cooperation is likely to lead to the rise of the prophesied King of the North, who is to be the final leader of the Beast of Revelation.

The fact is that I do not believe that President Obama is INTENTIONALLY trying to set the U.S.A. for destruction, but because of his timing and his stated policies, he is certainly helping the U.S.A. prepare its enemies to destroy it.

Only real national repentance can save the U.S.A. and its Anglo-allies at this point, and I have seen nothing come out of Washington nor London that indicates that the leadership of the Anglo-countries is interested in anything like that.

Several articles of possibly related interest may include:

Europa, the Beast, and Revelation Where did Europe get its name? What might Europe have to do with the Book of Revelation? What about “the Beast”? What is ahead for Europe?
Barack Obama, Prophecy, and the Destruction of the United States Some claim that Barack Obama is the prophesied “son of Kenya”. Might Bible prophecy be fulfilled since he is to be the USA president?
Prophecies of Barack Obama? Are there biblical and non-biblical prophecies about Barack Obama. Did Nostradamus predict Barack Obama dealing with the Antichrist?  This article contains many of the reasons that Barack Obama is apocalyptic.
Anglo – America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel Are the Americans, Canadians, British, Scottish, Welsh, Australians, Anglo-Southern Africans, and New Zealanders descendants of Joseph? Where are the lost ten-tribes of Israel? Who are the lost tribes of Israel? Will God punish the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and other Anglo nations? Why might God allow them to be punished first?
Barack Obama Carries Hindu Monkey God Although there are some strange and false stories about Barack Obama, this one seems to be true.
Barack Obama is Not the Antichrist Some have suggested that he may be, but he cannot be.  Find out why.
Two Horned Beast of Revelation and 666 This article explains how the LCG views this, and compares this to Ellen White.  Neither John McCain nor Barack Obama are 666.
End of Mayan Calendar 2012–Might 2012 Mean Something? There is a Mayan calendar prediction for change in 2012. 2012 changes were also centuries ago predicted by the Hopi Native Americans (the Hindus may have some predictions for the next decade as well). Do these Mayan/Hindu/Hopi prophecies have any value? Why might Satan have inspired this date? Does the Dresden codex show destruction of the earth by flood? Can the great tribulation start before 2012?

Calculated Calendar Used Since Noah?

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

A shofar made from the horn of a Greater kudu

A Shofar made from the horn of a Greater kudu.
New months were historically brought in with a blast from a trumpet (
Psalm 81:3-4 ).

COGwriter

Carl Franklin (a long-time COG member, an independent researcher,  who has had a close working relationship at times with  CBCG, but now is more distant) just put out a Theological Research Report (which he dated March 31, 2009, though the final version did not come out until today) which is devoted to an article based upon the fact that the calendar that God uses is essentially a calculated one with postponements.  Here is some of what he said about it:

…this issue presents conclusive Biblical evidence of the calculation of the Hebrew Calendar in the days of Noah. This evidence is presented in an article by Don Roth which analyzes the scriptural chronology of the Noachian Flood and demonstrates in a straightforward and factual manner that the year of the Flood was 385 days in length. This year length is the maximum number of days that the Hebrew Calendar allows and occurs only when an intercalary month is added and the rules of postponement are applied. Scriptural and historical evidence that has previously been published demonstrates that the Hebrew Calendar of today was in use at the time of Christ (See The Calendar of Christ and the Apostles, Parts I & 2). The evidence that Don Roth presents demonstrates that this calendar has been in use from the time of Noah. This span of time covers nearly the entire history of mankind.

While I have not attempted to verify Don Roth’s calculations, I do believe that by the time of Christ, the Jews used a calculated calendar.

The old Global Church of God had an article by the late Raymond McNair in which he basically proved that Jesus observed the holy day calender that included postponements–and I do believe that.

While people outside the COGs might think that this is not a big deal, there are several groups with their own differing ways of calculating the holy days. I have never seen any group, however, that taught against the postponements ever reaching the world with the gospel message (their focus and priorities always seem to be elsewhere).

We in the Living Church of God accept the calculated calendar (as do most Jews).

The Holy Days themselves start very soon.  Next week actually.

Some articles of possibly related interest may include:

Is There “An Annual Worship Calendar” In the Bible? This paper provides a biblical and historical critique of several articles, including one by WCG which states that this should be a local decision. What do the Holy Days mean? Also you can click here for the calendar of Holy Days.
Passover and the Early Church Did the early Christians observe Passover? What did Jesus and Paul teach? Why did Jesus die for our sins?
Melito’s Homily on the Passover This is one of the earliest Christian writings about the Passover. This also includes what Apollinaris wrote on the Passover as well.
Should Christians Keep the Days of Unleavened Bread? Do they have any use or meaning now? What is leaven? This article supplies some biblical answers.
New Moons Some observe them, some do not; here are scriptures and comments.
Holy Day Calendar This is a listing of the biblical holy days through 2012, with their Roman calendar dates. They are really hard to observe if you do not know when they occur 🙂

G20 Praises “New World Order”

Friday, April 3rd, 2009


World Currencies

COGwriter

The G20 is not only working towards a “new world order” the British Prime Minister even claims that it has begun:

G20 Summit

Obama hails the new world order

Markets soar after President brokers ‘historic’ G20 deal between world leaders to bring end to recession

By Andrew Grice, Nigel Morris and Sean O’Grady

Friday, 3 April 2009

Gordon Brown declared that a $1 trillion package to stimulate economic growth agreed at yesterday’s G20 summit in London will ensure that the world pulls out of recession more quickly.

Speaking after the one-day summit of the world’s richest nations in the Docklands, the Prime Minister said there were “no quick fixes”, adding: “Today’s decisions will not immediately solve the crisis. But we have begun the process by which it will be solved.”

He said: “This is the day that the world came together to fight back against the global recession, not with words, but with a plan for global recovery and for reform and with a clear timetable for its delivery.”

The US President Barack Obama played a key role in brokering the agreement, resolving tensions between China and France on tax havens.

The $1trn will be made available to countries that run into trouble via the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and World Trade Organisation, which will all be beefed up. Half the money will come from IMF loans, with $250bn to finance trade deals and a further $250bn from the IMF’s currency reserve.

Mr Brown and President Obama originally wanted the G20 summit to call for higher government spending and tax cuts, but they ran into opposition from European nations, led by Germany and France. However, the summit kept open the option of such action in 2010 if the $5trn fiscal stimulus scheme does not work. The IMF will have a new role in monitoring whether countries are doing enough to help the world economy grow at about 4 per cent a year.

G20 leaders will meet again to review progress, probably in New York in September, to coincide with the annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly.

Last night British ministers said the real significance of yesterday’s agreement was not the $1trn package but the enhanced role it gave to world institutions like the IMF, whose budget will triple to $750bn. “A new world financial order has been born, almost by accident, because of this crisis,” one cabinet minister said. “These bodies have been revamped; now they need to raise their game.”

The IMF will no longer be regarded as a last-resort option for nations facing bankruptcy, but will instead take preventative action. Many nations have been reluctant to turn to the fund because the stigma of doing so sends bad signals to the financial markets.

The special drawing rights (SDRs) made available by the IMF – which can be converted by national governments into currency to provide a swift injection of liquidity into their economies – will be increased by a further $250bn. The funds will be used in the short term to support the precarious economies of eastern and central Europe. Romania and Turkey are the latest nations to seek help from the IMF; others in recent months include Ukraine, Pakistan, Iceland and Latvia. The IMF has expressed acute concern that a crisis in these economies could spread via the banks to western European countries.

China is playing a notably bigger role, pledging $40bn for the improvement in the IMF’s resourcing. Most of the rest comes from the US and Europe. China has publicly called for an increased role for the IMF’s own “world currency”, the SDR. A long-awaited reform of the governance of the IMF should deliver China more votes and influence.

Last night President Obama hailed the meeting as “a turning point in our pursuit of global economic recovery”. He told the press: “By any measure, the London summit was historic. It was historic because of the size and the scope of the challenge that we face and because of the timeliness and the magnitude of our response.”

The President said that “former mortal enemies” had come together to agree a common path out of recession. “I am very proud of what has been done, but this alone is not enough. The actions we take in our individual countries is vital.” He added: “It’s hard for 20 heads of state to bridge their differences. We’ve all got our own national policies, our own assumptions, and our own politics. But our citizens are hurting – they need us to come together.”

The 20 leaders also agreed to reform the financial system to prevent a repeat of the crisis. Mr Brown trumpeted the “start of the end” for tax havens refusing to be transparent about the money they hold; they will be named and shamed.

Last night, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development issued a “blacklist” of four offending countries: Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines and Uruguay. In the run-up to the summit, Switzerland, Austria, Luxembourg, Andorra and Singapore joined a new spirit of openness. Yesterday Brunei and Guatemala agreed to abide by the new rules. The Channel Islands, the Isle of Man and British overseas territories such as the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands already comply with the guidelines.

Under yesterday’s deal, tax havens would have to open their books to other countries upon request, or face tough sanctions. Banks across the world face a regime of checks to guard against a repeat of the excessive lending that triggered the global financial meltdown.

The leaders pledged to give their regulators the powers to collect all the relevant information about banks and to strengthen links between regulators from different countries to pool information about multinational financial institutions. Hedge funds will be brought into the regulatory system. Bankers’ pay will reflect long-term performance, not short-term risk-taking.

Mr Brown pronounced the free-market consensus was over, hailing a “new consensus” among the largest countries. “From today we will together manage the process of globalisation,” he said.

On the fiscal stimulus, the Prime Minister insisted: “The issues that people thought divided us did not divide us at all. There was substantial agreement on the need for us to do whatever is necessary to return to growth.”

Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President, who had threatened to walk out if he was not happy with the outcome, said: “There were moments of tension. Never would we have thought to get as big an agreement.” He praised President Obama for helping to create consensus and persuade China to agree to publish lists of tax havens. Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, called the measures “a very, very good, almost historic compromise” that will give the world “a clear financial markets architecture”…

The deal: Key points

Boosting world economy…

An extra $1 trillion pumped into the global economy via the International Monetary Fund. IMF reserves increased by $500bn to $750bn.

Help for ailing economies…

IMF will boost by $250bn the cash countries can access through “special drawing rights”. It is similar to “quantitative easing” – printing money.

Cleaning up banks…

Greater powers for regulators and strong supervision of multinational institutions. Curbs on pay and bonuses. Hedge funds regulated.

Increasing trade….

$250bn trade support package offered to developing countries.

Tax havens…

Must open their books or be “named and shamed” and face sanctions.

Reform of IMF…

IMF and the World Bank beefed up. Fast-growing countries gain influence. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/obama-hails-the-new-world-order-1661088.html

Making small countries show details of their bank accounts to other larger countries is a step in the direction of the time  “that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” (Revelation 13:17).

Also, ending “free market consensus” seems to be a new and strange direction for those who claim to love freedom.

The USA and the UK need to realize that in the old financial world order they were on the top.  In any new financial world order, they can only go down from there.

And that is what the Bible prophecies.

Articles of possibly related interest include:

Anglo – America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel Are the Americans, Canadians, British, Scottish, Welsh, Australians, Anglo-Southern Africans, and New Zealanders descendants of Joseph? Where are the lost ten-tribes of Israel? Who are the lost tribes of Israel? Will God punish the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and other Anglo nations? Why might God allow them to be punished first?
Prophecy Obama: Prophecies of Barack Obama? Eight reasons why Barack Obama is apocalyptic and eight reasons why Barack Obama is not the Antichrist. This article includes many biblical and non-biblical prophecies, from around the world, that seem to discuss Barack Obama. Did Nostradamus predict Barack Obama dealing with the Antichrist?  Might Barack Obama set the stage for the kings of the North and South as at least one Shiite prophecy suggests?  This is the longest and most complete article on this page on Barack Obama prophecies. Read it and decide for yourself if President Obama seems to be fulfilling various prophecies.
Barack Obama, Prophecy, and the Destruction of the United States Some claim that Barack Obama is the prophesied “son of Kenya”, based up an early 20th century writing.
Europa, the Beast, and Revelation Where did Europe get its name? What might Europe have to do with the Book of Revelation? What about “the Beast”? What is ahead for Europe?
Asia in Prophecy What is Ahead for China? Is it a “King of the East”? What will happen to nearly all the Chinese, Russians, and others of Asia? China in prophecy, where? Who has the 200,000,000 man army related to Armageddon?

CG7 on Peter and the Rock

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Rebuilt Gymnasium in Sardis

COGwriter

CG7 reported the following question and answer.

Q Does Matthew 16:18 teach that Christ would build the church upon Peter, as a large segment of Christianity teaches?

A This verse records Jesus’ words “And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.” The key word here is rock. What, or who, does Christ mean when He speaks that word?

The word in question is the Greek petra. It denotes a mass of rock, such as could be used for the sure foundation of a house (Luke 6:48) or out of which a tomb could be cut (Matt. 27:60). In other texts, petra refers to the Lord Jesus Christ, the spiritual rock of both testaments and the foundation on which the church is built (1 Cor. 10:4; Rom. 9:33).

Catholic Christians believe that the rock in Matthew 16:18 refers to Peter, the apostle who first served as church bishop in Rome and who became for them the first among all bishops of the universal church. This theory depends on the fact that the Greek form of Peter (petros) is closely related to the word petra.

The difference between petra and petros is in the magnitude and stability of the rock. The former signifies a large, building-sized rock, whereas the latter refers mostly to smaller pieces (stones and pebbles) of the main rock. Thus Jesus is the rock, and Peter is a stone.

If Jesus had intended to identify Peter as the stone upon which He would build His church, it seems He would have said, “You are petros [Peter], and upon this petros [upon you, Peter] I will build My church.”

Instead Jesus used a different word than Peter to describe the foundation of the church He would build. He used petra instead of petros. The fact that Jesus used a different designation for the foundation than for the man strongly suggests that He did not regard the man to be the foundation. It is true that Peter, as an apostle of Jesus Christ, has a place of honor alongside the other apostles in the church’s foundation, all of it anchored to the chief cornerstone, Christ (Eph. 2:20). It is even more true that Jesus himself is the only foundation that can ever be laid for His church (1 Cor. 3:11) and that all the rest of us, including Peter, are smaller stones and pebbles built upward upon the one Foundation.

Peter himself knew and wrote this truth (1 Peter 2:4, 5ff). — Elder Calvin Burrell

Although there are a couple of words I would have removed from the above, CG7’s position is essentially consistent with what LCG teaches on this.

Those who would like to see more on this and the related matters should study the following articles:

Was Peter the Rock Who Alone Received the Keys of the Kingdom? How should Matthew 16:18-19 be understood?
The Apostle Peter He was an original apostle and early Christian leader.
What Do Roman Catholic Scholars Actually Teach About Early Church History? Although most believe that the Roman Catholic Church history teaches an unbroken line of succession of bishops beginning with Peter, with stories about most of them, Roman Catholic scholars know the truth of this matter. This eye-opening article is a must-read for any who really wants to know what Roman Catholic history actually admits about the early church.
Which Is Faithful: The Roman Catholic Church or the Living Church of God? Do you know that both groups shared a lot of the earliest teachings? Do you know which church changed? Do you know which group is most faithful to the teachings of the apostolic church? Which group best represents true Christianity? This documented article answers those questions. Português: Qual é fiel: A igreja católica romana ou a igreja viva do deus? Tambien Español: Cuál es fiel: ¿La iglesia católica romana o La Iglesia del Dios Viviente? Auch: Deutsch: Welches zuverlässig ist: Die Römisch-katholische Kirche oder die lebende Kirche von Gott?
Location of the Early Church: Another Look at Ephesus, Smyrna, and Rome What actually happened to the primitive Church? And did the Bible tell about this in advance?
Apostolic Succession What really happened? Did structure and beliefs change? Are many of the widely-held current understandings of this even possible? Did you know that Catholic scholars really do not believe that several of the claimed “apostolic sees” of the Orthodox have apostolic succession–despite the fact that the current pontiff himself seems to wish to ignore this view?  Is there actually a true church that has ties to any of the apostles that is not part of the Catholic or Orthodox churches?  Read this article if you truly are interested in the truth on this matter!
Early Church History: Who Were the Two Major Groups Professed Christ in the Second and Third Centuries? Did you know that many in the second and third centuries felt that there were two major, and separate, professing Christian groups in the second century, but that those in the majority churches tend to now blend the groups together and claim “saints” from both? “Saints” that condemn some of their current beliefs.
The History of Early Christianity Are you aware that what most people believe is not what truly happened to the true Christian church? Do you know where the early church was based? Do you know what were the doctrines of the early church? Is your faith really based upon the truth or compromise?

Britain May Lose Gilbralter and Falklands

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Palace of Westminster in London

COGwriter

Britain may lose control over the Falklands and Giltbralter:

British naval bases ‘should be handed over to Brussels’
Lloyd’s List – March 31, 2009

BRITISH naval bases around the world should be at the service of the European Union to protect shipping lanes, according to a report under study in the European parliament.

Naval bases in Gibraltar, Cyprus and the Falkland Islands need to be part of an EU “forward presence” for securing vital trade routes, says the report.

Commissioned by the parliament’s subcommittee on security and defence and discussed earlier this week, the report argues that bases belonging to both Britain and France need to be “Europeanised” so that the EU can match the military might of Asian navies.

“The EU Member States’ military installations — mainly French and British — would provide a formidable asset for the geographical and functional expansion of EU Grand Strategy,” says the report, written by two UK-based academics, James Rogers and Luis Simon.

Trade lanes can be secured only if the far-flung bases belonging to the two main European naval powers are put to common use, the authors argue: “As the world moves towards a dynamic multipolar system and US relative maritime power declines as powers like China and India rise, there is a growing and compelling need for Europeans to take responsibility for the Sea Lines of Communication that link them to the farthest corners of the world, particularly those most vital to European trade and security.”

It continues: “The growing cost of sustaining a comprehensive maritime infrastructure therefore calls for further EU co-operation to ‘Europeanise’ the Anglo-French forward presence and undergird EU maritime security more effectively, while simultaneously protecting European Sea Lines of Communication and maintaining an extended EU forward presence overseas.”

Existing bases should be transferred to the EU, it is claimed. “As the EU assumes a wider role in the security and defence of the entire bloc, institutional reforms will be required so that it can handle the new and demanding tasks. One of these may be for Britain and France to transfer the maintenance and upkeep of their military installations to a central institution, funded by all of the Member States.”

To oversee this transfer the EU should appoint a ‘Special Representative for Geostrategy’ to work alongside a new foreign policy chief.

The report, which quoted the success of the anti-piracy mission off Somalia — the EU’s first joint naval mission — went as far as identifying specific British ships which could serve the EU: “Britain, in particular, has under construction two new 65,000 tonne ‘pocket supercarriers’. The sheer size and capability of these vessels will provide the Royal Navy — and potentially, the EU — with a greatly enhanced expeditionary and maritime power projection capability.”

Euro-sceptics were quick to ridicule the idea. “If this had been discussed on April 1, I could have understood it,” said Geoffrey Van Orden MEP, defence spokesman for the UK’s Conservative party.

“These are among the most hubristic proposals the EU has yet produced in support of its defence policies. I have criticised the EU’s military operations as mere exercises in sticking an EU badge on our soldiers’ arms. Now they want to run up the EU flag on our ships and even our overseas territories.”

He continued: “There is no mention of Britain’s close connections with Commonwealth countries such as Australia and Canada or of the need to revitalise the Nato alliance to meet common challenges and threats.

“This has nothing to do with a genuine contribution to European security and everything to do with EU promotion of its own misplaced military ambitions.”

http://www.lloydslist.com/ll/news/british-naval-bases-should-be-handed-over-to-brussels/20017634459.htm;jsessionid=382138CC5671190C757BBAD0FD653BA1

Why is this of any prophetic interest?

Regular readers of this page are aware that we in the Living Church of God believe that a changed European confederation will rise up and ultimately destroy the US, UK, and their Anglo-allies.  Controlling strategic naval locations would certainly help make that possible.

We in the Living Church of God believe that one of the blessings that God promised the descendants of Rebekah were the gates of those who would hate them.  Notice the following from the Old Testament:

60 And they blessed Rebekah and said to her:

“Our sister, may you become
The mother of thousands of ten thousands;
And may your descendants possess
The gates of those who hate them.” (Genesis 24:60)

Notice what Living Church of God’s Roderick C. Meredith wrote about it:

In the late summer of 1954, I traveled with Mr. and Mrs. Armstrong and their elder son, Richard David, through much of Britain. Mr. Armstrong gave, in a series of meetings, a personal warning to the British people about what would happen if they did not repent. Many who heard those warnings are still alive.
Mr. Armstrong told the British people that although God had given them national greatness and control over the vital “sea gates” such as Suez, the routes around the tips of South Africa and South America, the vital Malacca Strait in Southeast Asia and other sea passages absolutely vital in controlling world trade and vital in time of war, God would begin to take these “gates” away—one by one—unless they repented. And the true God would humble the British-descended and American peoples and begin to break the “pride” of our power (Leviticus 26:19).
Only about 700 people turned out to hear Mr. Armstrong in Belfast, Northern Ireland, and even smaller crowds attended in Scotland and England. Enthusiasm was high because of Mr. Armstrong’s dynamic style, but many doubted what he was saying: that these vital sea gates would in fact be taken away.
Yet only two years later, my wife and I were sent to Britain and visibly felt the impact of some of these prophetic statements that no one else understood at the time! For the winter of 1956–57 was the time of the “Suez Crisis” when Britain was forced to withdraw from the Suez Canal. Then there was a terrible fuel shortage. And in the intervening years, Britain was also pressured to give up control of the Malacca Strait, the great Simonstown Sea Base (the passage around the Cape of Good Hope). Since then, the U.S. has given up control over its only major sea gate—the Panama Canal.http://www.tomorrowsworld.org/cgi-bin/tw/tw-mag.cgi?category=Magazine16&item=1104098600

The Anglo-American powers controlled most of the most important sea gates and many of the important land gates for many, many decades.  However, we in the also believe that because the Anglo-American nations have turned their backs on God, that He would remove those blessings–and we in the true church have been saying this for over 50 years.

And now, instead of controlling the majority of strategic sea gates that gave an advantage over the enemies of the Anglo-American nations, those considered enemies now control or at least can use those same gates for their strategic advantage.  And if the EU gets its way, it will control even more of them.

Prophetic events continue to line up as we in the Living Church of God teach.

Several articles of possibly related interest may include:

Anglo – America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel Are the Americans, Canadians, British, Scottish, Welsh, Australians, Anglo-Southern Africans, and New Zealanders descendants of Joseph? Where are the lost ten-tribes of Israel? Who are the lost tribes of Israel? Will God punish the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and other Anglo nations? Why might God allow them to be punished first?
Barack Obama, Prophecy, and the Destruction of the United States Some claim that Barack Obama is the prophesied “son of Kenya”, based up an early 20th century writing.
Prophecies of Barack Obama? Are there biblical and non-biblical prophecies about Barack Obama. Did Nostradamus predict Barack Obama dealing with the Antichrist? This is the longest and most detailed of the articles here at COGwriter related to prophecy and Barack Obama.
Europa, the Beast, and Revelation Where did Europe get its name? What might Europe have to do with the Book of Revelation? What about “the Beast”? What is ahead for Europe?
Who is the King of the North? Is there one? Do biblical and Roman Catholic prophecies point to the same leader? Should he be followed? Who will be the King of the North discussed in Daniel 11? Is a nuclear attack prophesied to happen to the English-speaking peoples of the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand? When do the 1335 days, 1290 days, and 1260 days (the time, times, and half a time) of Daniel 12 begin? When does the Bible show that economic collapse will affect the United States?